R.Ashok Kumar v. The Managing Director

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty First day of January Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, The CHIEF JUSTICE and The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN CMP(MD) No.232 of 2016 IN WA(MD) No.SR40320 of 2015 R.ASHOK KUMAR ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT Vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR TAMIL NADU CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, NO.12, THAMBUSAMY ROAD, KILPAUK, CHENNAI. ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone to delay 1149 days in filing the above Appeal in WA.(MD). SR.No.40320/2015 and thus render justice.

WA.(MD).SR.40320/2015: Appeal against the order passed in WP.(MD). No.7246/11 dated:06.06.2012 by this Hon'ble courts Prayer in WP(MD). 7246/ 2011 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertainng to the impugned order of the 2nd respondent issued in G.O.Ms.No.116 P&A.R(M) Dept,dated 18.08.2010 and quash the same and consequently directing the 1st respondent to permit the petitioner to participate in the selection process to the post Assistant Manager by considering the educational qualification of the petitioner and also to consider his meritorious qualification while considering the said appointment.

ORDER : This Civil Miscellaneous petition is coming on for hearing upon perusing the Application and the judgment and decree of the Lower court and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. T.LAJAPATHI ROY, Advocate for the petitioner, the court made the following order:-

ORDER

(Order of the court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) There is no explanation for such an inordinate delay of 1149 days in the application filed, except referring to some illness without any particulars of date or material.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Be that as it may, even on merits, the matter is covered by the Judgment of the First Bench of this court in T.I.Muthukumar and others Vs.Registrar General, High court, Madras and another, reported in (2011)2 MLJ 785, against the petitioner.

3.The petition is dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(P&A) /True copy/ Sub AssistantRegistrar TO

1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR TAMIL NADU CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, NO.12, THAMBUSAMY ROAD, KILPAUK, CHENNAI.

2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PERSONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (M) DEPARTMENT FORT SAINT, GEORGE, CHENNAI-9.

+1. C.C. to M/S. T.LAJAPATHI ROY Advocate SR.No.3676 sm:AAL-MPA:SAR I:01.02.2016:2p/4C Date :21/01/2016

ORDER

IN CMP(MD) No.232 of 2016 IN WA(MD) No.SR40320 of 2015 IN WP(MD) 7246/11 Dismissing this petition etc., as stated within.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/