Ramar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fifteenth day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.12620 of 2015 RAMAR ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SIVAGIRI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DIST.

CRIME NO.166 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.V.SASIKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as sole accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.166 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to money dispute between the accused and the de-facto complainant on 03.06.2015 there was a wordy quarrel between them, in which the accused attacked the de-facto complainant with aruval and also threatened the de-facto complainant with dire consequences.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that in the alleged occurrence, no one has sustained any injury.

5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that no one sustained injury in alleged occurrence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sivagiri and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 15/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGIRI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TIRUNELVELI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SIVAGIRI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT.

4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1cc to MR.V.SASIKUMAR,Advocate Sr.No.39005

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12620 of 2015 Date :15/07/2015 AA/21.07.2015/2p- 6C/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/