State Rep. By Commissioner v. R.Thayalan

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Third day of February Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.SUBBIAH and The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CMP(MD) No. 36 AND 37 of 2017 IN WA(MD) No.SR32565and 32561 of 2014 1 STATE REP. BY COMMISSIONER & SECRETARY OF GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU, DEPPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND PRODUCTION, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI.

2 THE COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING, GOVERNMENT ESTATE, GUINDY, CHENNAI.

... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS IN BOTH THE PETITIONS Vs R.THAYALAN ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN BOTH THE PETITIONS Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to set aside the order dated 18.04.2016 and restore the M.P.(MD). No.1/2014 in W.A.SR(MD).No.32565&32561/2014 on the file of this Honourable Court respectively.

PRAYER IN WA(MD) No.SR32565and 32561 of 2014: Writ Appeal against the order of this Court order dated 19.04.2013 made in W.P.(MD)NO.10407 OF 2008 & W.P.(MD) NO.483 of 2009& Prayer in WP(MD). 10407/ 2008 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Certioraraified Mandamus, call for the records from the 1st respondent in Go (3D). No. 329 Agriculture (AA7) Department dated 26/10/2007 quash the same and direct the respondents to return the sum of Rs. 3,600/- which was deducted from the pension of the petitioner as punishment and Rs. 2,31,606/- whi9ch was deducted from the retirement benefits of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the petitioner to the petitioner.

Prayer in WP(MD). 483/ 2009 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issue of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records from the 1st respondent in GO (3d) No.311 (AA7) Department dated 17.10.2007 and direct the 1st Respondent to grant suitable promotion to the petitioner as Deputy Director of Agriculture with all financial benefits.

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. SPL GOVT PLEADER, Advocate for the petitioner and of on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:- In view of the fact that delay has already been condoned and cost has also been paid, these petitions are ordered, on satisfying with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitions, and the order dated 18/04/2016 in set aside and MP(MD) NOs.1 and 1 of 2014 in WA(MD) SR.NOs.32561 and 32565 of 2014 are restored to file.

sd/- 03/02/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE COMMISSIONER & SECRETARY OF GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU, DEPPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND PRODUCTION, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI.

2 THE COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING, GOVERNMENT ESTATE, GUINDY, CHENNAI.

MAS/CM-MSA:15.02.2017:2P/3C

ORDER

IN CMP(MD) No.37 of 2017 IN WA(MD) No.SR32565 of 2014 Date :03/02/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/