Rajkumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Eighth day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.12750 of 2015 RAJKUMAR ... PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL TOWN WEST POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL, CRIME NO.342/2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the sole accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 341 and 506(i) of I.P.C., in Crime No.342 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

4. Considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dindigul and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the

petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of one week and thereafter as and when required. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 08/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, DINDIGUL 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL TOWN WEST POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL,

1. CC to M/S.B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate SR.No.37555 DM 13 7 15 - 2P 6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12750 of 2015 Date :08/07/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/