M. Sankarraj v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Eighth day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.12754 of 2015 1 M. SANKARRAJ 2 P. BOOPATHYRAJA 3 P. PUGAL RAJ ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 1 - 3 Vs STATE REP BY: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CENTRAL POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI, CRIME NO.330/2015 ... RESPONDENT(S) / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.G.THALAIMUTHARASU Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, in Crime No.330 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) IPC and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.According to the defacto complainant, due to money dispute, the petitioners picked up quarrel with the defacto complainant and attacked him by hands and caused simple injuries. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the respondent police. 4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the State submitted that there was wordy quarrel and none sustained injury in this case.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thoothukudi, and on each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction to the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 08/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, THOOTHUKUDI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CENTRAL POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI, +1. CC to M/S.G.THALAIMUTHARASU Advocate SR.No.37301 DM 9 7 15

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12754 of 2015 Date :08/07/2015 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/