← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/745/2021granted

Purusothaman v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-02-08Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 08/02/2021 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP(MD) No.745 of 2021 Purusothaman ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Pulivalam Police Station, Trichy District.

Crime No.555 of 2020. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.Maheswaran.R., Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Section 438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory bail in Crime No.555 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 379 of IPC seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner herein had cut down 13 trees from the Government poramboke land situated in S.No.164, Moovanoor Village and sole the same. Hence the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner is no way connected with the said offence and the respondent police without conducting proper enquiry has implicated the petitioner herein. He would also submit that the trees are already in the custody of the petitioner.

1/3

4.The learned Government Advocate(Criminal Side) would submit that the petitioner herein had cut down 13 trees from the Government poramboke land situated in S.No.164, Moovanoor Village and sole the same 5.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the fact that the trees were also recovered this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) to the credit of Crime No.555 of 2020 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur without prejudice to his defence at the time of producing sureties and on such deposit being made, the learned Magistrate shall accept the sureties produced by the petitioner.

(c)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

(d)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(e)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

2/3

(g)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 08/02/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THURAIYUR.

2. -DO- THROUGH: THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PULIVALAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.745 of 2021 Date :08/02/2021 AAV SRS/JC/SAR-I/11.02.2021/3P/5C 3/3