Divyadharshini v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Awps-Thallakulam
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 09/01/2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
1. Divyadharshini
2. Renugadevi ... Petitioners Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, AWPS Thallakulam Police Station, Madurai District.
(Crime No.31/2025).
... Respondent PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 31/2025 on the file of the respondent Police.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.R.Kannappan, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For Intervenor : Mr.N.Anand Kumar 1/6
ORDER
The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 85 and 318(4) of BNS corresponding to Section 498-A and 420 of IPC, in Crime No.31 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that A1 and the defacto complainant are husband and wife. The present petitioners are in-laws of the defacto complainant. From the date of marriage, the petitioners and other accused harassed the defacto complainant demanding additional dowry. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and have not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution, and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail for the petitioners.
2/6
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioners are in-laws of the defacto complainant and demanded additional dowry from the defacto complainant and harassed her. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and considering the nature of offences and also the fact that the petitioners are in-laws of the defacto complainant, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai District, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on further conditions that:
[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their 3/6
photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required;
[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[e] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners are released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; and 4/6
[f] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.
09.01.2026 CP TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai District.
2.The Inspector of Police, AWPS Thallakulam Police Station, Madurai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court, Madurai.
5/6
S.SRIMATHY,J CP
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.574 of 2026 Date : 09/01/2026 6/6