← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/13018/2014ordered

G. Balamurugan v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-01-06Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Sixth day of January Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.13018 of 2014 G. BALAMURUGAN ... PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE UMACHIKULAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI DT, CRIME NO.787 OF 2014 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.J.JEYAKUMARAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 406 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.787 of 2014, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioner is the owner of the land and entered into a sale agreement and that he failed to execute the sale deed in favour of the defacto complainant.

3. It is seen that on the directions passed by this Court in Crl.O.P (MD).No.9893 of 2014, this case has been registered by the respondent police.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that this matter is relating to civil in nature, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial MagistrateII, Madurai on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. and 6.30 p.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 06/01/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II,MADURAI.

2.DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3.THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE UMACHIKULAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S.J.JEYAKUMARAN Advocate SR.No.177

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.13018 of 2014 Date :06/01/2015 RG.08.01.2015 2P.6C.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/