G.Kathiresan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Third day of February Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.13023 of 2014 G.KATHIRESAN ... PETITIONER/1st ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CITY CRIME BRANCH, TRICHY.

CR. NO. 12 OF 2014. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.R.RAJAGOPAL Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 406, 409, 417, 420 and 120(B) IPC, in Crime No.12 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Mr.M.Kannan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, seeks adjournment. Earlier, this Court posted the case on 17.02.2015, finally. On that day, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought adjournment and this Court has declined to grant adjournment and passed the following order:- "2. The case of the de facto complainant is that the petitioner herein approached him and stated that he has a lay out of residential plots and promised to allot 1,200 square feet house plot to the de facto complainant. Accordingly, the de facto complainant agreed to the proposal given by the petitioner and the petitioner registered 1,200 square feet of land in favour of the de facto complainant for a sale consideration of Rs.2,50,000/-. Initially, the petitioner had told the de facto complainant that the value of the plot was only Rs.

50,000/-, but when the plot was registered for Rs.2,50,000/-, the de facto complainant questioned him for which the petitioner has explained that only if the plot value is registered at Rs.2,50,000/-, the Banks will issue housing loan for consideration. In February, 2011 the petitioner had taken the defacto complainant to state Bank https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.

of Travancore in Teppakulam Branch and had obtained housing loan of Rs.6,50,000/- in the name of the de facto complainant and thereafter, he has neither built the house nor repaid the Bank amount. Hence, the complaint."

3. Taking into consideration of the serious allegations against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant Anticipatory Bail to him. Hence, the petition is dismissed. sd/- 23/02/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CITY CRIME BRANCH, TRICHY.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.13023 of 2014 Date :23/02/2015 AA/26.02.2015/2p- 3c/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/