Madras High CourtWP(MD)/19652/2013dismissed as infructuous

A. Muthu Puthiyavan v. The Deputy Collector (Stamps)

2023-03-10Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.03.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2013 W.P.(MD)No.19652 of 2013 A.Muthu Puthiyavan ... Petitioner versus

2. The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned notice of the 2nd respondent in A.No.763/07 dated 07.10.2013 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to return the original sale deed No.763/2007 1/4

dated 14.03.2007.

W.P.(MD)No.19653 of 2013 S.M.Ayyakutti ... Petitioner versus

2. The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned notice of the 2nd respondent in A.No.3046/08 dated 07.10.2013 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to return the original sale deed in Document No. 3046/2008 dated 29.09.2008.

For Petitioner in both W.Ps.

: Mr.K.Esakki For Respondents in both W.Ps.

: Mr.S.Shaji Bino, Additional Govt. Pleader 2/4

COMMON ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the prayer sought for in both the writ petitions have become infructuous and therefore, both the writ petitions may be closed. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Recording the same, both the writ petitions are closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 10.03.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet: Yes / No.

To 3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy

2. The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, 10.03.2023 4/4