A.Kalai Alias Perumal v. The Inspector Of Police,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Sixth day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.13019 of 2015 1 A.KALAI ALIAS PERUMAL 2 SANKAR ALIAS PACKIARAJ ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANI NOT KNOWN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTHANATHAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO. 166 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.C.JOSEPH SATHIANESON Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506 (i) of the Indian Penal Code in Crime No.166 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 01.07.2015, the petitioners along with other accused assaulted the defacto complainant with hands and criminally intimidated him.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this is a case of case in counter and the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital.
5. Considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) and also considering the fact that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 06/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAPPARAI.
2.
-DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY.
3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTHANATHAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.
4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
SR : 11.08.2015 : 2P/5C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.13019 of 2015 Date :06/08/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/