Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/13053/2015allowed

Kadambavanam v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2015-07-23Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Third day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.13053 of 2015 1 KADAMBAVANAM 2 PRABHU ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE A. MUKKULAM POLICE STATION, A. MUKKULAM, VIRUDHUAGAR DISTRICT.

CR.NO.64 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.B.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) I.P.C in Crime No.64 of 2015 and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have nothing to do with the alleged offence and it is a case of case and counter. The counter case has been registered in Crime No.65 of 2015 against the defacto complainant.

3.The learned Government Advocate submitted that injured had already been discharged from the hospital.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the state and also perused the entire materials available on record.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest

or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 23/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKKOTTAI.

2 -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE A. MUKKULAM POLICE STATION, A. MUKKULAM, VIRUDHUAGAR DISTRICT, +1. CC to M/S.B.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate SR.No.41270 akm/27.07.15 /2p-6c/

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.13053 of 2015 Date :23/07/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/