A.Shanthi, v. The Tahsildar,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.08.2022

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR A.Shanthi ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Tahsildar, Alangudi Taluk, Alangudi, Pudukottai District.

2.Raman ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to grant patta for the properties in S.No.333/2C, an extent of 0.15.0 and 37 cents at Alangudi Taluk, Vadakadu Village, Pudukottai District and in Survey No.395/6, an extent of 1 acre 06 cents at Alangudi Taluk, Kezhathur Village, Servaikaranpatti, Pudukottai District by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 15.02.2013, within the period stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Haja Mohideen For R1 : Mr.D.Sasi Kumar Additional Government Pleader For R2 : Died ***** 1/4

O R D E R

The present writ petition has been filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to grant patta to two survey numbers belonging to the petitioner by way of two sale deeds, dated 02.01.2013 and 04.01.2013.

2.A perusal of the typed set of papers indicate that some revenue records are standing in the name of the second respondent also. 3.In view of the limited prayer sought for in the writ petition, the first respondent is directed to consider the request of the petitioner for grant of patta for the above said survey numbers, after giving due opportunity to the writ petitioner and the legal heirs of the second respondent. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 2/4

4.With the above said observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

04.08.2022 Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No Tmg To The Tahsildar, Alangudi Taluk, Alangudi, Pudukottai District.

3/4

R.

VIJAYAKUMAR ,J.

Tmg Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

Order made in 04.08.2022 4/4