S.Pandian Alias Pannai Pandian v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fifteenth day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) Nos.13085 & 13274 of 2015 1 S.PANDIAN ALIAS PANNAI PANDIAN 2 V.RAJENDRAN 3 SENTHURPANDIAN, ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 1 to 3 IN CRL OP(MD) No.13085 of 2015 GUHANESA PANDIAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN IN CRL OP(MD) No.13274 of 2015 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAYAPPANPATTI POLICE STATION, RAYAPPANPATTI, THENI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.196 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT IN BOTH PETITIONS For Petitioner : M/S.C.MUTHUSARAVANAN Advocate IN BOTH PETITIONS For Respondent : M/S.K.V.RAJARAJAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITIONS FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

IN BOTH PETITIONS COMMON ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 435, 506(i) and 109 of I.P.C., in Crime No.196 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. According to the de-facto complainant, on 05.07.2015, the accused had gone to the house of the de-facto complainant and demanded money and also damaged his two wheeler to the tune of Rs.3,000/-.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that one Kannan has sustained injury in a motor vehicle accident involving the vehicle belonging to the de-facto complainant and the accused have gone to the house of the de-facto complainant to seek financial assistance and at that time, wordy quarrel arose between them and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the petitioners have no bad antecedent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam, Theni District and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 15/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, UTHAMAPALAYAM.

2 Do Thro THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI DISTRICT. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAYAPPANPATTI POLICE STATION, RAYAPPANPATTI, THENI DISTRICT.

+2. CC to M/S.C.MUTHUSARAVANAN Advocate SR.No.39113. TS/21.07.2015/2P - 7C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.13085 & 13274 of 2015 Date :15/07/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/