← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/13103/2015allowed

Ashok Kumar v. The Inspector Of Police,

2015-10-12Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twelfth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.13103 of 2015 1 ASHOK KUMAR 2 KANMANI 3 SASIKUMAR ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED No.1 to 3 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, IN CR. NO.20 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.D.ANBARASU Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498(A) and 506

(2) IPC and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 4 of Tamilnadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act in Crime No.20 of 2015 and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.It is alleged that the petitioners have harassed the defacto complainant and demanded dowry.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. It is further submitted that the defacto complainant is not willing for re-union and she refused to live with the first petitioner.

4. The Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the State submitted that the petitioners have demanded Rs.5 1⁄2 lakhs and 5 cents of land.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Kanyakumari, and on each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction to the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police at 10.00 a.m until further orders and the petitioners https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2 and 3 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 12/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III,KANYAKUMARI 2 DO THRO THE CHEIF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.D.ANBARASU Advocate SR.No.60349.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.13103 of 2015 Date :12/10/2015 AM/15.10.2015/AMF/SAR-I/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/