← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/801/2026disposed of

Mathikumar v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2026-01-19Honourable Mrs Justice L.Victoria Gowri5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.01.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.801 of 2026 Mathikumar

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.State of Tamil Nadu rep., by the Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thogaimalai Police Station, Karur District.

3.Tamilselvi 4.Navaneethan ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 particularly the second respondent to take appropriate legal action on the petitioner's complaint dated 05.01.2026 in accordance with law of BNSS 2023. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murugappan 1/5

For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Sakthikumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)

ORDER

Seeking to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate legal action on the petitioner's complaint dated 05.01.2026, this criminal original petition is filed.

2.Considering the nature of the order to be passed, notice to the respondents 3 and 4 is dispensed with.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the third respondent, who is the wife of the petitioner, had eloped with the fourth respondent more than ten years ago. However, the grievance of the petitioner is that during the period when the third respondent was living with him, he had executed a settlement deed in respect of all his immovable properties in favour of the third respondent, allegedly on her inducement. After obtaining the settlement deed in her favour, she subsequently eloped with the fourth respondent and now, with an 2/5

intention to harm the petitioner, the third and fourth respondent are together trying to kidnap the petitioner, for which, the petitioner had made a complaint before the second respondent Police on 05.01.2026. The inaction of the second respondent police has necessitated the filing of the present petition by the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (crl.side), on instructions, submitted that they have not received any complaint in person, but the complaint mentioned by the learned counsel for the petitioner has been sent by post. In this regard, the second respondent police would look into the matter.

5.In view of the above, directing the second respondent police to deal with the aforesaid case in accordance with law, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

19.01.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Rmk 3/5

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thogaimalai Police Station, Karur District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

Rmk Crl.O.P.(MD)No.801 of 2026 19.01.2026 5/5