← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/20529/2013disposed of

M/S Poonam Trading Company, v. The Commercial Tax Officer,

2020-02-24Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice Subramonium Prasad3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.02.2020 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.A.P.SAHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD W.P.(MD) Nos.20529, 20530 and 20709 of 2013 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1,1 and 1 of 2013 W.P. (MD) Nos.20529 and 20350 of 2013 M/S.Poonam Trading Company rep. by its Partner, S.Navin S.Patel 123, Tenkasi Road Ilanji, Tirunelveli District.

.. Petitioner in both Cases Vs The Commercial Tax Officer Shencottah (C).

.. Respondent in both Cases PRAYER in W.P. (MD) No.20529 of 2013: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the impugned proceedings of the respondent in TIN:33785701177/2007-2008, dated 29.11.2013 and quash the same as illegal.

PRAYER in W.P. (MD) No.20530 of 2013: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the impugned proceedings of the respondent in TIN:33785701177/2008-2009, dated 26.7.2013 and quash the same as illegal.

W.P. (MD) No.20709 of 2013 Tvl.Muthu Agencies rep. by its Partner, S.Usha Rani 7-A, Vengalakadai 1st Street .. Petitioner Vs 1 The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Secretary to Government Commercial Taxes and Registration Department Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

2 The Assistant Commissioner (CT) Vengalakadai Street Circle .. Respondents PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the respondent herein in TIN No:33854860197/2011-12, dated 20.11.2013 and quash the same as invalid, illegal and against Articles 14 and 19(1)(g), besides being violative of Article 301 of the Constitution of India and, therefore, inoperative and unenforceable and recoveries pursuant thereto are without authority of law and infringe Article 265 of the Constitution of India. For Petitioner in W.P.

(MD) Nos.20529 and 20530 of 2013 : Mr.R.D.Ganesan For Petitioner in W.P.

(MD) No.20709 of 2013 : Mr.A.Chandrasekaran For respondents in all writ petitions : Mrs.J.Padmavathi Devi Spl. Government Pleader COMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD,J.) The petitioners herein have challenged the assessment orders passed by the respondent authorities.

2. In view of the fact that an efficacious alternative remedy is available to the petitioners by way of an appeal under Section 51 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 to the Appellate Deputy Commissioner, we permit the petitioners to withdraw these writ petitions and prefer the statutory appeal.

3. These writ petitions are dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to file appeals before the appellate authority in terms of Section 51 of the Act. Needless to say that, we are not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

Sasi/rsb To:

1. The Commercial Tax Officer Shencottah (C).

2 The Secretary to Government State of Tamil Nadu Commercial Taxes and Registration Department Fort St. George Chennai.

3 The Assistant Commissioner (CT) Vengalakadai Street Circle COPY TO: The Section Officer, E.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

(Note: Return the original impugned order to the learned counsel for the petitioners after substituting the same with photocopies) +2 CC to M/s.R.D.GANESAN, Advocate ( SR-7827 and 7828) +1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-8102[F] dated 25/02/2020 ) W.P.(MD) Nos.20529, 20530 and 20709 of 2013 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 of 2013 (3 Petitions) SMA/05/03/2020/3P/8C 24.2.2020