Madras High CourtCMP(MD)/2480/2021withdrawn dismissed

Sethu Ammal v. 1. Muthu (Died), 2. Sadatcharam (Died), 3. Ponnammal (Died),

2023-06-16Honourable Mr Justice P.Velmurugan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Sixteenth day of June Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.VELMURUGAN CMP(MD) No.2480 of 2021 in SA.No.197 of 2001 1 SETHU AMMAL 2 BOOPATHY AMMAL 3 PUSHPA 4 RAJU 5 KALYANI AMMAL, (DIED) 6 REVATHY ... PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS Vs

1. MUTHU (DIED), ... 1st RESPONDENT in S.A

2. SADATCHARAM (DIED) ... 2nd RESPONDENT in S.A

3. PONNAMMAL (DIED) ... 3rd RESPONDENT in S.A

4. MOGANATHAN 5 MARIAPPAN 6 VELAYUTHAM 7 KALINGANATHAN 8 AMARAVATHI 9 GOMATHI 10 NAGAVALLI, 11 JEYAMANI 12 S.MUNIASAMY 13 S.THIAGARAJAN

14 PANCHAVARNAM 15 R.GOTHAINAYAKI 16 SAROJA @ KUPPAIKALAI,(DIED) 17 SIGAPPI 18 THILLAINAYAGAM 19 SAIVATHURAI (DIED) 20 NAGARATHINAM 21 SEENIVASAN 22 KALIAMMAL 23 ABHISHEKAMURUGAN 24 SATHIYAMURTHY 25 RAJESH 26 DEVAKI 27 POOMAYIL 28 RAJAMANICKAM (DIED) 29 PRAKASAM ... RESPONDENTS 1 TO 29/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 29 30 M.THULASIRAMAN 31 R.KANNAKI 32 MAHESWARAN 33 R.VANITHA 34 R.SANGEETHA ... RESPONDENTS 30 TO 34/ PROPOSED RESPONDENTS 30 TO 34 35 MATHAVAN 36 VENKATRAMAN 37 LAKSHMIBAI 38 SARASWATHI ... RESPONDENTS 35 TO 38/ PROPOSED RESPONDENTS 35 TO 38

Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to serve notice to proposed respondents 35 to 38 in the above C.M.P/(MD).No.10409 o 2018 in S.A.No.197 of 2001 by substituted service i.e. by way of publication in any one of the Tamil daily news Papers, circulated in the area of residence of these respondents.

Prayer in SA. 197/ 2001 :

To prefer this Memorandum of Grounds of Second Appeal against the Judgment and Decree dated 3.7.2000 and made in A.S.No.79/96 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Ramanathapuram confirming the Judgment and decree dated 2.4.1996 and made in O.S.No.389/1990 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Ramanathapuram. ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.RAMESH, Advocate for the petitioners, the Court made the following order:- In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- 16/06/2023 / TRUE COPY / /06/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

am TO THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANATHAPURAM.

THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF RAMANATHAPURAM.

COPY TO :

THE REGISTRAR(JUDICIAL), MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

THE SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, AE SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

THE SECTION OFFICER, JUDICIAL SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CMP(MD) No.2480 of 2021 in SA.No.197 of 2001 Date :16/06/2023 (1/3) SS/BUC/23/06/2023/4P/6C