Thangam v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Third day of January Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN CRL OP(MD) No.1061 of 2018 1 THANGAM 2 SIVAN 3 MANI 4 LAKSMANAN 5 VENKATESH ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO.2,4 TO 7 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MOOLAKARAIPATTI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.07/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners: M/S.S.R.DURAIRAJ, Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 294 (b), 332 & 307 IPC in Crime No.07 of 2018 on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the de facto complainant is the Sub Inspector of Police. When at the time of alleged offence the first accused attacked the de facto complainant with sickle and also abused him in filthy language.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they are no way connected with the offences, and pleads for grant of anticipatory bail.

4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) submitted that no one sustained injuries in the alleged occurrence and the investigation is still pending.

5.The submissions made by the learned counsel on either side are considered. This case has been registered against the petitioners for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 332 & 307 IPC. It is alleged that during the time of occurrence, the petitioners along with other 3 accused waylaid the Police Officers and committed this offence. As per the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) no one sustained injuries in the alleged occurrence. Therefore, the reason for registering https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the case under Section 307 IPC is best known to the Investigating Officer only. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, custodial interrogation is not necessary for completing the investigation.

7.Taking all the above said aspects into consideration and having regard to the nature of offence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, they are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (i) the petitioners shall report before the Viruthunagar Bazar Police Station daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. (ii) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

(iii) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

(iv) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioners shall stand automatically cancelled and the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 23/01/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NANGUNERI.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MOOLAKARAIPATTI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIRTHUNAGAR BAZAR POLICE STATION.

5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK, Advocate SR.No.1209 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.1061 of 2018 Date :23/01/2018 MS/PM-PN/SAR.3/29.01.2018/2P.7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/