Madras High CourtWP(MD)/872/2022dismissed as infructuous

Christuraj v. The Authorized Officer

2022-01-28Honourable Mrs Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana,Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy2 pages

W.P(MD)No.872 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.01.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P(MD)No.872 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD) No.702 of 2022 Christuraj ... Petitioner Vs.

The Authorised Officer, Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd., Marthandam Branch, 1-1A, Periyakattuvilai, Thiruvananthapuram Main Road, Pammam, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District.

... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned sale notice dated 09.12.2021 issued by the Respondent for the property situated in R.S.No.293/1A, to an extent of 13 cents of Kollanchi Village (previously Nattalam Post, Killiyur Panchayat), Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District standing in the name of the petitioner and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ponkarthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.N.Dilipkumar Standing Counsel

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.) The Writ Petition has been directed against the E-Auction Sale Notice, dated 09.12.2021, issued by the respondent bank, fixing the date and time of sale as 27.01.2022, at 3.00 p.m. 2.Mr.N.Dilipkumar, learned Standing Counsel, appearing for the respondent submitted that the sale could not be held for want of bidders and hence, the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3.In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P(MD)No.872 of 2022 infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD-II) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) sj Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

+1 CC to M/s.N.DILIPKUMAR, Advocate ( SR-2990[F] dated 28/01/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.R.PONKARTHIKEYAN, Advocate ( SR-3211[F] dated 31/01/2022 ) W.P(MD)No.872 of 2022 28.01.2022 RK(07/02/2022) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2