Erulandi v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty First day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.13651 of 2015 1 ERULANDI 2 PANCHAVARNAM ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 & 2 Vs STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VEERACHOLAN POLICE STTION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRCT, CRIME NO.57 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.BASKARAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 and A2 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.57 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity on 12.07.2015, there was a wordy altercation between the de-facto complainant and the accused, in which the accused attacked the de-facto complainant with aruval and also threatened the de-facto complainant with dire consequences.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the injured has sustained head injury and he was taking treatment as outpatient.

5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the 1st petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of two https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation and the 2nd petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 21/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKOTTAI.

2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEERACHOLAN POLICE STATION,VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.A.BASKARAN Advocate SR.No.40028

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.13651 of 2015 Date :21/07/2015 PA/AMF/23.07.2015/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/