P.Thangavel v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Second day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.13655 of 2015 P.THANGAVEL ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VEDASANTHOOR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DIST.

(CRIME NO. 367 OF 2014) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.ALAGUMANI Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate(crl.side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A1 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under section 306 of IPC, in Crime No.367 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that A2 and A3 introduced by A1 to the deceased Chellappan, have borrowed Rs.2,00,000/- from the deceased, but they failed to repay the amount and they also threatened him saying that they would give a complaint against him, hence, he committed suicide.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. The learned counsel further submitted that the de-facto complainant and the deceased were doing money lending business, charging exorbitant interest and in this connection, a case was registered against them in Crime No.331 of 2014 under the provisions of Exorbitant Interest Act and thereafter, they were arrested and remanded to judicial custody and subsequently, the said Chellappan committed suicide. It is further submitted that even according to the prosecution, the petitioner/A1 introduced the other accused to the deceased, at the time of borrowal of the amount.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent.

5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vedasanthoor and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 22/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,VEDASANTHOOR.

2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL.

3.THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VEDASANTHOOR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DIST.

+1. CC to M/S.R.ALAGUMANI Advocate SR.No.40731

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.13655 of 2015 Date :22/07/2015 RG.24.07.2015 2P.6C.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/