Thavasi @ Sangaralingam v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Virudhunagar East
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 09/01/2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL.O.P(MD)No.714 of 2026
1. Thavasi @ Sangaralingam
2. Nithiyanantham
3. Sudha @ Sudha Lakshmi ... Petitioners Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, East Police Station, Virudhunagar.
Crime No.159/2025.
... Respondent PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.159 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police.
For Petitioners : Mr.J.Balasubbiramaniam, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abulkalaam Azad Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/6
ORDER
The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 468, 120(B) of IPC, in Crime No.159 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and other accused received money from the defacto complainant for getting job for her. Thereafter, they neither secured a job nor returned the money to the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and have not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution, and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the co-accused has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court and the petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail for the petitioners.
2/6
4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent submitted that the petitioners and other accused had cheated the defacto complainant to secure a job and the investigation is almost completed. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the co-accused was already granted anticipatory bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on further conditions that:
[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their 3/6
photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of one week and thereafter, as and when required; [c] the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[e] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners are released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; and 4/6
[f] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.
09.01.2026 CP TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar, 2.The Inspector of Police, East Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
5/6
S.SRIMATHY,J CP
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.714 of 2026 Date : 09/01/2026 6/6