T.Rathinam Chettiar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirteenth day of January Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.138 of 2015 T.RATHINAM CHETTIAR ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.1 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TRICHY DISTRICT.

CR. NO. 7/2012. ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.CHANDRA KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S.C.Ramesh Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offences under Section 419, 420,423,467,471 and 477 IPC in Crime No.7 of 2012, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the property in question belongs to the defacto complainant and his two brothers, and the two brothers of the defacto complainant died and the defacto Complainant was abroad. Taking advantage of this, the petitioner had credited a fabricated power of attorney deed as if the deceased person and the defacto complainant had given a power of attorney to him on 07.05.2002 and on the strength of the power of attorney, the petitioner has sold the property to the other accused in this case.

3. Taking into consideration of the seriousness of the allegations against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, this petition is dismissed. sd/- 13/01/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TRICHY DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI TS/21.01.2015/2P-3C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.138 of 2015 Date :13/01/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/