← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/661/2026granted

Pavithra v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Pew-Thiruverambur

2026-02-11Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11-02-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD) NO. 661 of 2026 Pavithra Petitioner(s) Vs The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Thiruverambur PEW Police Station Trichy Crime No.637/2025 Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Ananda Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor Prayer:

C-32B.For Bail in Crime No.637/2025 on the file of the respondent police

ORDER

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 31.12.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) read with 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act in Crime No.637 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the respondent police seized 2 kg of ganja from the petitioner. Hence, this case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and she has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. However, she has been arrested and she is languishing in jail from 31.12.2025. Therefore, he prays for grant of bail.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police opposed for grant of bail on the ground that the investigation is still pending. Further, there is one previous case against the petitioner which is similar in nature and Act 14 is dropped.

5.Considering the fact that the quantity of ganja is not commercial quantity, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner on certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge / Presiding Officer Special Court for EC and NDPS Act, Pudukkottai, and on further conditions that, a)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity; b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation, until further orders; c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness;

d)the petitioner shall not abscond during trial; e)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. f) If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

11-02-2026 Tmg To

1. Inspector Of Police, Thiruverambur PEW Police Station Trichy

2. Additional District and Sessions Judge / Presiding Officer Special Court for EC and NDPS Act, Pudukkottai.

3.Central Prison, Trichy.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai.