Gurumoorthy v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Second day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.13858 of 2015 GURUMATHY ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DHONDI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DT, CRIME NO.103/2015 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.SATHYA CHIDAMBARAM Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate(crl.side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as an accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 324, 323, 397(NP) of IPC, in Crime No.103 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 24.06.2015, the accused took away 8 sovereigns of gold chain belonging to the defacto complainant. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent lady and she has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that A1, A3 and A5 were arrested and released on bail.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the accused attacked the de-facto complainant with hands and took away the gold chain of the de-facto complainant and the alleged property was recovered. 5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

er 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram District and on her https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 22/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TIRUVADANAI.

2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM. 3.THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DHONDI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S.S.SATHYA CHIDAMBARAM Advocate SR.No.40524

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.13858 of 2015 Date :22/07/2015 RG.24.07.2015 2P.6C.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/