← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/13860/2015allowed

B.Velmurugan v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-07-22Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.07.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13860 of 2015 1.B.Velmurugan 2.D.Saravanan 3.K.Suriya Prakash 4.E.Logeshwaran 5.S.Vivek 6.B.Marutha Nayagam 7.C.Sankar @ Sankar Ganesh ... Petitioners/A1 to A7 Vs.

1.The Inspector of Police, Thirumangalam Police Station, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai (Crime No.208 of 2014)

...Respondent No.1/Complainant

2.B.Prasanth

...Respondent No.2/Defacto

Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records relating to the proceedings in Crime No. 208 of 2014 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the case. For Petitioners : Mr.V.Angusamy For R1 : Mr.K.Anbarasan Govt. Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 : Mr.A.Balaji

ORDER

This Criminal Original petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C seeking to quash the FIR in Crime No. 208 of 2014 on the file of the first respondent.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the second respondent and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State.

3.Both the petitioner and the defacto complainant are college students. The alleged occurrence is said to have happened during NSS Camp. The petitioners are arrayed as A1 to A7 in Crime NO. 208 of 2014 for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 324, 355 IPC r/w Section 3(1) (x) of SC/ST Act, 1989 on the file of the first respondent police.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. In the grounds raised, it has been stated that the matter has been compromised and there is no need to proceed further. A joint compromise memo dated 20.07.2015 has also been filed to that effect duly signed by the parties and attested by the learned counsel for the parties. The second respondent/defacto complainant is also present before this Court and the second respondent has reiterated the same. This Court has perused the compromise memo. 5.Considering the submissions made and after going through the relevant documents including the offences alleged against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to quash the charge sheet as no useful purpose would be served by keeping the FIR any longer. Accordingly, the FIR in Crime No. 208 of 2014 on the file of the first respondent police is quashed. The compromise memo shall form part of record. This petition is ordered.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (C.O.) \\True copy\\ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam.

2. The Inspector of Police,Thirumangalam Police Station,Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.V.Angusamy, Advocate Sr.No.39957 akm/28.07.15 /2p-5c/ CRL.O.P.No.13860 of 2015 22.07.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/