Perumal v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Second day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.13863 of 2015 1 PERUMAL 2 UTCHI MAHALI 3 RAMASAMY 4 SHANMUGASUNDHARAM 5 KANNI ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 2 - 6 Vs STATE REP By; THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI TOWN, TIRUNELVELI DT, CR.No. 7 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT(S) / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.R.DURAIRAJ Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A2 to A6, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498(A) of I.P.C.

, and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.7 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant was harassed by the accused for want of more dowry. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) on instruction would submit that the first accused/A1 was arrested and remanded to judicial custody and A2 to A6 are in-laws of the de-facto complainant.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.

5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Tirunelveli and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 22/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV, TIRUNELVELI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI TOWN, TIRUNELVELI DT

1. CC to M/S.S.R.DURAIRAJ Advocate SR.No.40376 DM 23 7 15 - 2P 6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13863 of 2015 Date :22/07/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/