← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/1659/2018ordered

Dhanush @ Dhanush Raja, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2018-02-02Honourable Mr Justice R. Pongiappan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Second day of February Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN CRL OP(MD) No.1659 of 2018 DHANUSH @ DHANUSH RAJA ... PETITIONER /1st ACCUSED Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALAKKADU POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.35/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. D.VENKATESH, Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARTHI, Govt.Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/A1, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 379 of IPC., and Section 3(1) TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.35 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner transported 1⁄4 unit of river sand by using a Mini Tipper lorry without obtaining any valid permission from the appropriate authority. Hence, the present case is registered against the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he is no way connected with the alleged offence and pleads for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioner transported 1⁄4 unit of river sand by using a Mini Tipper Lorry and the properties have been recovered. He further submitted that the investigation is still pending.

5. The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side are considered. It is alleged that during the time of occurrence, the petitioner committed theft of 1⁄4 unit of river sand by using a Mini Tipper Lorry. As per the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), as of now, the property which was used for the commission of offence and the river sand are https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

all recovered. Further, the petitioner is the first offender. Accordingly, custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be necessary for completing the investigation. Henec, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain stringent conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (i) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m.,until further orders;

(ii) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(iii) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(iv) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner shall stand automatically cancelled and the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 02/02/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NANGUNERI.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALAKKADU POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S. D.VENKATESH Advocate SR.No.1850 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.1659 of 2018 Date :02/02/2018 MS/CM-VR/SAR.4/06.02.2018/2P.6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/