Thirukannan v. The District Revenue Officer

1 W.P.(MD)NO.1553 OF 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.01.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.1553 of 2023 Thirukannan ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Revenue Officer, Ramnad, Ramanathapuram District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies CID, Ramanathapuram.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to release the petitioner's Auto PIAGGIO three wheeler bearing registration No. TN 65 F 2048 seized by the 2nd respondent on 15.12.2022 within the time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Karthick For R-1 : Mr.B.Saravanan, Additional Government Pleader.

For R-2 : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh, Government Advocate (Crl. Side).

* * * 1/5

2 W.P.(MD)NO.1553 OF 2023

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2. The petition mentioned vehicle was seized in connection with Crime No.265 of 2022 registered on the file of the second respondent.

3. The petition mentioned vehicle is presently in the custody of the second respondent. The vehicle is said to have been used for illegally transporting PDS rice.

4. It is of course open to the respondent authority to initiate confiscation proceedings. In this case we are concerned only with the issue of granting interim custody of the vehicle to the petitioner.

5. No purpose will be served in keeping the vehicle under the custody of the respondents. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the decision reported in (2002) 10 SCC 283 (Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai and Others V. State of Gujarat) has held as follows:- 2/5

3 W.P.(MD)NO.1553 OF 2023 "17.In our view, whatever be the situation, it is of no use to keep such seized vehicles at the police stations for a long period. It is for the Magistrate to pass appropriate orders immediately by taking appropriate bond and guarantee as well as security for return of the said vehicles, if required at any point of time. This can be done pending hearing of applications for return of such vehicles.

6. Therefore, the second respondent is directed to grant interim custody of the said vehicle to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:- a) The petitioner shall not alienate or encumber the vehicle till the proceedings are completed.

b) The petitioner shall produce all the documents pertaining to the ownership of the seized vehicle. If the petitioner is an agreement holder, he can produce the relevant xerox copies.

c) As and when the respondents call for the vehicle for enquiry, the petitioner has to produce the vehicle in question and he shall cooperate with the enquiry to be conducted by the respondents.

3/5

4 W.P.(MD)NO.1553 OF 2023

7. Upon completion of these formalities, the respondents shall grant interim custody of the vehicle forthwith to the petitioner without any delay. If this undertaking given by the petitioner is breached, the petitioner will not be entitled to interim custody of the vehicle in future. The Writ Petition is allowed accordingly. I make it clear that allowing of this writ petition will not have any bearing on the confiscation proceedings that may be initiated by the authorities. No costs. 27.01.2023 NCS : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU Note : Issue order copy on 27.01.2023.

To:

1. The District Revenue Officer, Ramnad, Ramanathapuram District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies CID, Ramanathapuram.

4/5

5 W.P.(MD)NO.1553 OF 2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.

PMU W.P.(MD)No.1553 of 2023 27.01.2023 5/5