Sekar v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Third day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.13978 of 2015 1 SEKAR 2 JEYARANI 3 PANDI SELVI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 2-4 Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMMAYANAKKANOOR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. CRIME NO.274 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.N.SATHISH BABU Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/A2 to A4 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 447, 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) I.P.C in Crime No.274 of 2015 and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that due to previous enmity in a civil dispute, the petitioners along with the first accused trespassed into the land of the defacto complainant and also threatened him.

3.The learned Government Advocate submitted that subsequent to wordy quarrel, the occurrence took place and the victim sustained simple injury.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the state and also perused the entire materials available on record. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakkottai, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 23/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKKOTTAI 2 -do-thro THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMMAYANAKKANOOR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.N.SATHISH BABU Advocate SR.No.40616 Sm:KBM:27.07.2015:1P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.13978 of 2015 Date :23/07/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/