← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/14004/2015allowed

Poongodi v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-08-04Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fourth day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.14004 of 2015 1 POONGODI 2 SUBRAMANI 3 SARASWATHI 4 BOSE 5 KARUPPASAMY 6 ANGAYARKANNI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No. 1 to 6 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AVIYOOR POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DT, CRIME NO.126/2015 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.V.SASIKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A6, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(i) I.P.C.

and Section 4 of Prohibition of Women Harrasement Act in Crime No.126 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant namely Radhamani alleged that the petitioners came to the place of the de-facto complainant's village and attacked the de-facto complainant and caused injuries to the de-facto complainant and her husband.

3. It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital. She further submits that it is a case of case and counter.

4. Considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) and also considering the fact that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. K.KALYANASUNDARAM,J.

gsr

5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar, and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for period of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

three weeks. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 04/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO II, VIRUDHUNAGAR 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,VIRUDHUNAGAR 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AVIYOOR POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DT, 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.V.SASIKUMAR Advocate SR.No.44396 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14004 of 2015 Date :04/08/2015 JAM/AMD/SAR-i/11.8.15/2P-6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/