Durairaj v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.07.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14039 of 2015 1.Durairaj 2.Ramachandran 3.Palchamy 4.Dharmalingam ... Petitioners/A1,A3, A4 and A6 Vs.

1.State through represented by its Inspector of Police, Abramam Police Station, Ramanatharpuram District.

In Crime NO.70 of 2011 ...1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Anantha Natarajan ..2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings in C.C.No.114 of 2012 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate cum District Munsif, Kamudi and quash the same with regard to the petitioners/A1, A3, A4 and A6 concerned and pass such other other order or orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Krishnan for K.J.Associates For R1 : Mr.K.Anbarasan Govt. Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 : Mr.Jayamani

O R D E R

This Criminal Original petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C seeking to quash the Charge Sheet in C.C.No.114 of 2012 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate cum District Munsif, Kamudi.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the second respondent and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State.

3.The petitioners are arrayed as A1, A3, A4 and A6 in C.C.No.114 of 2012 and charges have been framed against them as follows:

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Accused Nos.

U/s.

1 and 3 147, 148, 294(b), 323 and 506 (ii) IPC 4 and 6 147, 148, 323, 506(ii) IPC 2 and 5 147, 148, 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC

3. In the grounds raised, it has been stated that the matter has been compromised and there is no need to proceed further. A joint compromise memo dated 16.07.2015 has also been filed to that effect duly signed by the parties and attested by the learned counsel for the parties. The second respondent is also present before this Court and the second respondent has reiterated the same. This Court has perused the compromise memo. 4.Considering the submissions made and after going through the relevant documents including the offences alleged against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to quash the charge sheet as no useful purpose would be served by keeping the Charge Sheet any longer. Accordingly, the Charge Sheet in C.C.No.114 of 2012 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate-cum- District Munsif, Kamudi, is quashed. The compromise memo shall form part of record. This petition is ordered.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Record) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar ses To

1. The District Munsif dum Judicial Magistrate, Kamudi 2.The Inspector of Police,Abramam Police Station, Ramanatharpuram District 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.s.Krishnan,Advocate in Sr No.40304 CRL.O.P.No.14039 of 2015 22.07.2015 RG.22.07.2015 2P.5C.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/