Palanichamy v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Fourth day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.14097 of 2015 1 PALANICHAMY 2 GOPI 3 MUTHU ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 to 3 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERWADI DURGAH POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM, CRIME NO.133/2015 ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.K.KUMARAVEL Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.V.RAJARAJAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A3 in Crime No.133 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 09.07.2015 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 326(B), 354(D) and 506(ii)of I.P.C., and Section 4 of Women harassment Act r/w 109 of I.P.C., and hence, seek bail. 2.According to the de-facto complainant, on 07.07.2015, the accused came in a auto-rickshaw and threatened the daughter of the defacto complainant by stating that he will threw acid on her. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the occurrence said to have taken place on 07.07.2015, but the complaint was lodged only after two days ie., on 09.07.2015 and it is further submitted that no one has sustained injury in the alleged occurrence and even as per prosecution, the accused only threatened the daughter of the de-facto complainant.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side)would submit that it is a case of one side love and the accused have threatened the daughter of the de-facto complainant and the respondent police have recovered the autorickshaw and acid bottles from the accused. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail on the following conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ramanathapuram and on further condition that the petitioners shall reside at Trichy and report before the Trichy Cantonment Police Station daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. sd/- 24/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, RAMANATHAPURAM. 2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERWADI DURGAH POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM. 5 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, DISTRICT JAIL, RAMANATHAPURAM.

6. THE OFFICER INCHARGE, CANTONMENT POLICE STATION, TRICY +1. CC to M/S.K.KUMARAVEL Advocate SR.No. 41430. TS/24.07.2015/2P - 8C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.14097 of 2015 Date :24/07/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/