← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/1929/2018ordered

Raja v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-02-08Honourable Mr Justice R. Pongiappan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eighth day of February Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN CRL OP(MD) No.1929 of 2018 1 RAJA 2 ANANTHI 3 AMBIKA 4 PREMA @ PREMALATHA 5 ANUSIYA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 5 Vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THUVARANKURICHI POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT, (IN CRIME NO.3 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.S.MALAIKANI Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324 & 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code in Crime No.3 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to civil dispute, the petitioners assaulted the de facto complainant and also abused him. Hence, the present case has been registered.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they are no way connected with the offences, and pleads for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. According to him investigation is still pending.

5.The submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side are considered. It is alleged that during the time of occurrence, due to civil dispute, the petitioners assaulted the de facto complainant and also abused him. As per the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side), the person, who sustained injuries at the time of occurrence, was discharged from the hospital after completing treatment. Apart from that, except Section 506 (ii) IPC., the other offences mentioned in the petition are bailable in nature. Accordingly, custodial interrogation may not be necessary for completing the investigation. 7.

Taking the above said aspects into consideration and having regard to the nature of offence committed by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, they are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai, Trichy, on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

(i) the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

(ii) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

(iii) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

(iv) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioners shall stand automatically cancelled and the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 08/02/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

GNS TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAPPARAI, TRICHY 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TRICHY DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THUVARANKURICHI POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.S.MALAIKANI Advocate SR.No.2276 GJM/PM/PN/SAR-4-14.2.18-3P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.1929 of 2018 Date :08/02/2018