Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/14269/2015ordered

Joseph Main v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-07-27Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Seventh day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.14269 of 2015 1 JOSEPH MANI 2 JOSEPH JENOSAN ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO.1 & 2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THERMAL NAGAR POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.87 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.THIRUVADAIKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate(crl.side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/A1 & A2 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 294(b), 323, 506(ii) IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act in Crime No.87 of 2015 and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.It is alleged that at the instigation of the petitioners, three unknown persons have threatened the defacto complainant and his wife and had slapped the defacto complainant on his cheek and intimidated him.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the averments in the complaint are false and concocted.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that due to money dispute, there was wordy quarrel and none sustained injury.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thoothukudi, and on each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

satisfaction to the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 27/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, THOOTHUKUDI.

2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THOOTHUKUDI 3.THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THERMAL NAGAR POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.A.THIRUVADAIKUMAR Advocate SR.No.41765

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.14269 of 2015 Date :27/07/2015 rg.28.07.2015 2p.6c.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/