Dhanalakshmi v. The District Collector
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.02.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR WP(MD) No.1641 of 2026 and WMP(MD).No.1308 of 2026 Dhanalakshmi .....Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli 2.The Sub Collector Cheranmahadevi Tirunelveli District 3.The Tahsildar Cheranmahadevi Tirunelveli District 4.The Town Panchayat President Mukkoodal Town Panchayat Mukkoodal Tirunelveli District 5.The Executive Officer Mukkoodal Town Panchayat Mukkoodal Tirunelveli District ....Respondents Prayer: This Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 4 and 5 to put up Assembly of Benefits or Welfare Hall, Crematorium and put up Cement Road in Survey No.90/B, 90/1B at Mukkoodal Cheranmahadevi Taluk, Tirunelveli District.
1/5
For Petitioner : Mr D.Packiaraj For Respondents : Mr.M.Senthil Ayyanar Government Advocate for R1 to R3 :Mr.S.Kameswaran Government Advocate for R4 & R5
ORDER
The present writ petition has been filed seeking a mandamus forbearing the respondents 4 and 5 to put up Assembly of Benefits or Welfare Hall, Crematorium and put up Cement Road in Survey No.90/B, 90/1B at Mukkoodal Cheranmahadevi Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 2.As per counter filed by the respondents, they are not putting up any crematorium in Survey Nos.90/B and 90/1B. However, they have put up crematorium only in Survey No.90B/1B and 90B/2B of Mukkoodal Village. Paragraph No.(vii) of the counter is extracted as follows: "vii).But the petitioner herein has come out with the present writ petition by claiming that the land belonged to her grandmother Tmt.Isakkiammal. But the land indicated by the petitioner is in S.No.90/B and 90/1B, whereas the work relating to construction of Gasifier Crematorium is only in S.No.90B/1B and 90B/2B of Mukkoodal Village. Hence, there is no connection whatsoever in the claim of the petitioner as the area wherein the work is taken up is entirely different and furthermore the name of Isakkiammal or Parvathy is not found in the revenue records. 2/5
Hence, the petitioner herein is not entitled for the discretionary relief of this Court much less the relief of Mandamus sought which is liable for dismissal at the threshold." 3.In view of the fact that the petitioner's land has not been disturbed, no further orders are called for. This writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 04.02.2026 Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No msa 3/5
To 1.The District Collector Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli 2.The Sub Collector Cheranmahadevi Tirunelveli District 3.The Tahsildar Cheranmahadevi Tirunelveli District 4.The Town Panchayat President Mukkoodal Town Panchayat Mukkoodal Tirunelveli District 5.The Executive Officer Mukkoodal Town Panchayat Mukkoodal Tirunelveli District 6.The Section Officer V.R.Section Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai 4/5
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
msa WP(MD) No.1641 of 2026 and WMP(MD).No.1308 of 2026 04.02.2026 5/5