← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/2066/2018closed

M.Alagppan v. The Superintendent Of Police

2019-03-13Honourable Mr Justice N. Seshasayee2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.03.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2066 of 2018 M.Alagappan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Viralimalai Police Station, Viralimalai, Pudukkottai District.

3.Chinnasekar ... Respondents PRAYER:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the second respondent to give police protection for the petitioner's Textile shop situated in Pudukkottai District, Viralimalai Village in S.F.No.33/12 and also for his life and limb, on the basis of the representation dated 06.02.2018.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Karthick Subramanian For R1 and R2 : Mr.A.P.G.Ohm Chairma Prabhu Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R3 : Mr.K.P.Narayanakumar

ORDER

The petitioner apprehends threat to his life and liberty at the hands of the third respondent. He further submitted that the complaint preferred by the petitioner is pending with the second respondent police.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the official respondents.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. The learned counsel for the third respondent submitted that there was a civil dispute between the landlord of the petitioner and

one Chandrasekar. The landlord of the petitioner has earlier evicted the petitioner through legal process and delivery through Court has been obtained and thereafter, the third respondent has been inducted. Subsequently, by way of partition, the property came to be alloted to the third respondent. In the context of the prayer in this case, the learned counsel made a statement that the third respondent has never ever posed any threat to the petitioner endangering the life and liberty of the petitioner. 4.The said statement of the counsel for the private respondent is hereby recorded. Since there is no threat perception for the present, nothing survives for the present in this petition. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Viralimalai Police Station, Viralimalai, Pudukkottai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.K.P.NARAYANA KUMAR, Advocate in SR-54197 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2066 of 2018 13.03.2019 ta PK/23.04.2019 : 2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/