T. Sathishkumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Third day of February Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.14387 of 2014 T. SATHISHKUMAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REPPRESENED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUPARANKUNDRAM, MADURAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.88 OF 2014 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.VENKATESAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.88 of 2014, on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 498(A), 406 and 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner is now before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail.

2.It is seen that on 12.08.2014, this Court granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner till the conclusion of mediation and the case was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre and failure report, dated 08.01.2015 has been received from the Mediation Centre

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for the Stated and perused the materials available on record.

4. The case of the defacto complainant is that she was deserted by her husband and that she developed intimacy with the petitioner herein and the petitioner had promised that he will marry her and had taken lot of money from her.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. It is seen that the petitioner has lodged a complaint against Theivakani/defacto complainant as early as on 21.08.2012 before the Commissioner of Police, alleging that she is demanding exorbitant interest from him, for the loan received from her.

6. Under such circumstances, interim anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner is made absolute. If the petitioner had already furnished sureties, he need not furnish fresh sureties. The Petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

sd/- 03/02/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, MADURAI.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUPARANKUNDRAM, MADURAI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.R.VENKATESAN Advocate SR.No.5145 RL/6 C- 6/2/2015

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.14387 of 2014 Date :03/02/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/