A.Jaffar Sathik, v. The District Collector,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.01.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR W.P.(MD)Nos.9356, 13516 & 16553 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 1 and 2 of 2013 A.Jaffar Sathik ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.9356/2013 M.Neelemega Kannan ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.13516/2013 A.Gunaseely ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.16553/2013 Vs.
1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2.The Commissioner, Kodaikanal Municipality, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.
3.The Town Planning Officer, Kodaikanal Municipality, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District 4.The Thasildar, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.
5.The Member Secretary, Dindigul Town and Country Planning Office, Dindigul Local Planning Authority, Dindigul.
6.Rev. Ft. Paul Ignatius, The Correspondent, R.C.Town Higher Secondary School, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.
... Respondents 1 to 6 in W.P.(MD)Nos.9356, 13516 & 16553/2013 7.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
8.The Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.
... Respondents 7 and 8 in W.P.(MD)No.16553/2013 PRAYER in W.P.(MD)Nos.9356 & 13516/2013: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to forbear the 6th respondent from effecting any unauthorized construction or digging of earth in the land in old Survey No. 391, Ward D, Block 17, Convent Road, Moonjikal, Kodaikanal district by implementing the
order made by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.1440/2013/F1 dated 25/04/2013 and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 5 to restore the land in Old Survey No.391, Ward D, Block 17 Convent Road, Moonjikal Kodaikanal District to its original state.
PRAYER in W.P.(MD)No.16553/2013: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 and 5 to forbear the 6th respondent from effecting any unauthorized construction in the land in old Survey No. 391, Ward D, Block 17, Convent Road, Moonjikal, Kodaikanal classified as Poramboke in the light of the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.1440/2013/F1 dated 25/04/2013 and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 5 to restore the land in Old Survey No.391, Ward D, Block 17 Convent Road, Moonjikal Kodaikanal District to its original state and consequently, direct the 7th and 8th respondents to provide protection to the petitioner. W.P.(MD)No.9356/2013 For Petitioner :
Mr.Mohammed Rafi for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents :
Mr.N.Sathees Kumar, Additional Govt. Pleader for R1, R4 & R5 Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohaideen for R2 & R3
Mr.S.Rajasekar for M/s.Lajapathi Roy Associates for R6 W.P.(MD)No.13516/2013 For Petitioner :
Mr.Mohammed Rafi for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents :
Mr.N.Sathees Kumar, Additional Govt. Pleader for R1, R4 & R5 Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohaideen for R2 & R3 Mr.S.Rajasekar for M/s.Lajapathy Roy Associates for R6 W.P.(MD)No.16553/2013 For Petitioner :
Mr.Mohammed Rafi for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents :
Mr.N.Sathees Kumar, Additional Govt. Pleader for R1, R4 & R5 Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohaideen for R2 & R3 Father Xavier Associates for R6 Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram for R7 & R8
COMMON ORDER [Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.] These Writ Petitions have been filed seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 and 5 to forbear the 6th respondent from effecting any unauthorized construction in the land in old Survey No. 391, Ward D, Block 17, Convent Road, Moonjikal, Kodaikanal classified as Poramboke in the light of the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.1440/2013/F1 dated 25/04/2013.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the sixth respondent fairly submitted that the construction of the property in question has now been stopped and there is no further construction in the aforesaid property.
3. Recording the said submission, these Writ Petitions are closed. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, they can approach the second
respondent for taking further action, if necessary. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [D.K.K., J.] [M.S.K., J.] 08.01.2024 Index :
Yes / No vsm
To 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2.The Commissioner, Kodaikanal Municipality, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.
3.The Town Planning Officer, Kodaikanal Municipality, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District 4.The Thasildar, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.
5.The Member Secretary, Dindigul Town and Country Planning Office, Dindigul Local Planning Authority, Dindigul.
D.KRISHNAKUMAR , J.
and MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.
vsm W.P.(MD)Nos.9356, 13516 & 16553 of 2013 08.01.2024