← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/9502/2013dismissed for default

M.Rajarajan v. The Branch Manager

2022-09-14Honourable Mr Justice R.Vijayakumar4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.09.2022

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and M.P(MD)Nos.1,1,2 and 2 of 2013 M.Raja Rajan ... Petitioner (In both cases) Vs.

1.The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, No.201, Azhagarkovil Main Road, Appan Thiruppathy, Madurai District.

2.The Regional Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Anna Nagar, Madurai.

3.The General Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, No.151, Anna Salai, Chennai.

... Respondents (In both cases) PRAYER in W.P(MD)No.9502 of 2013 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the 1/4

demand notices dated 27.5.2013 of the first respondent issued for repayment of jewel loans dated 11.09.2012 in jewel loan account Nos. 741201863 for a sum of Rs.1,30,000/- and quash the same as illegal and further forbear the respondents from making premature demand of jewel loan repayment from the borrowers based on day to day market value of the gold before the expiry of repayment period fixed in the respective loan agreements.

PRAYER in W.P(MD)No.9503 of 2013 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the demand notices dated 30.5.2013 of the first respondent issued for repayment of jewel loans dated 16.08.2012 in jewel loan account Nos. 741201644 for a sum of Rs.57,000/- and quash the same as illegal and further forbear the respondents from making premature demand of jewel loan repayment from the borrowers based on day to day market value of the gold before the expiry of repayment period fixed in the respective loan agreements.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Maruthiah (In both cases) For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Senthil Kumar (In both cases) For R3 : No Appearance (In both cases) 2/4

COMMON ORDER Despite the matter being listed under the caption "for dismissal", there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Hence, both the Writ Petitions are dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 14.09.2022 Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No gbg 3/4

R.

VIJAYAKUMAR ,J.

gbg Order made in Dated:

14.09.2022 4/4