M. Ranjith Kumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of March Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN CRL OP(MD) No.2162 of 2018 1 M. RANJITH KUMAR 2 R. MALATHI 3 RAJA MOHAMMED 4 A. SULTHAN ALAUDEEN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TERKUVASAL POLICE STATION, TERKUVASAL, MADURAI.

IN CR.NO. 68 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.T.LAJAPATHIROY Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) For Intervenor : MR.M.KANNAN Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(i) and 420 I.P.C., in Crime No.68 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to money dispute, the petitioners are said to have abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and also threatened her with dire consequences. Hence, a case has been registered for the above said offences. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons, they have been falsely implicated, further added that they have not committed any offence as alleged, and pleads for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the intervenor. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.The learned Government Advocate(Criminal Side) appearing for the State submitted that investigation is still pending.

6. Documents perused. Previously, this Court by an order dated 26.02.2018 in Crl.O.P(MD).No.2162 of 2018, granted interim anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners subject to the condition that the petitioners shall execute the bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- each. Further, at the time of passing order, the issue related to the petition was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre attached to this Bench for amicable settlement.

7. Now, a bare perusal of records show that the learned Mediator, Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, sent a letter to this Court, in which, it was stated that the dispute between the petitioners and the defacto complainant are settled, for which, the Mediation agreement was also executed and the same is enclosed along with the Mediation Report. So, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the earlier order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD).No.2162 of 2018, dated 26.02.2018 is made absolute and the condition imposed on the petitioners is fully relaxed. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed.

sd/- 28/03/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI 2 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV, MADURAI 3 DO THORUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TERKUVASAL POLICE STATION, TERKUVASAL, MADURAI. 5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.M.KANNAN Advocate SR.No.5238

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2162 of 2018 Date :28/03/2018 MKV-CM-VR-SAR 3/10.4.2018/2P-7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/