Thavamani v. The Inspector Of Police,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.14436 of 2015 THAVAMANI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.4 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SURANDAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CR. NO. 123 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.KR.SINGARAVADIVEL Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed accused No.4, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 379 of IPC, in Crime No.123 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.
2.According to the defacto complainant, his lorry worth of Rs.5,00,000/- was stolen by the accused.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of the confession of the co-accused. He further submitted that the petitioner is running a old iron business at Madurai, whereas the occurrence had taken place in Tirunelveli District. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the prime accused Nos.1 to 3 were already secured and this petitioner is having no bad antecedents.
5.Considering the overt act attributed against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., for a period of one week and thereafter as and when required. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 18/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TENKASI.
2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SURANDAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S.KR.SINGARAVADIVEL Advocate SR.No. 47356. TS/22.08.2015/2P - 6C KBM/LIB
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.14436 of 2015 Date :18/08/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/