Anandaraj v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Eighth day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.14448 of 2015 ANANDARAJ ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARUMUGANERI POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DISTRICT. CRIME NO.252 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT(S) / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.V.MALAIYENDRAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as the sole accused, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) of I.P.C., and Section 4 of Woman Harassment Act, in Crime No.

252 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner scolded the de-facto complainant through cell phone by using filthy language and misbehaved with the de-facto complainant.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence. 5.Considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) and also considering the fact that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchendur and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 28/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUCHENDUR 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THOOTHUKUDI 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARUMUGANERI POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S.V.MALAIYENDRAN Advocate SR.No.42054 RG 29 7 15 - 2P 6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.14448 of 2015 Date :28/07/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/