Essakkiyappan, S/O.Perumal, v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty First day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.14468 of 2015 1 ESSAKKIYAPPAN, 2 PERUMAL, 3 MASANAM, ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THISAYANVILAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT. CRIME No. 228 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.MALAIKANI Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 307 of I.P.C., in Crime No.

228 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a dispute between the petitioners and the de-facto complainant, the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case and the occurrence is said to have taken place on 05.04.2015 but, the compliant was given on 01.06.2015 and there was a delay in preferring the complaint.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the injured has been injured from the hospital.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 21/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VALLIYOOR.

2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THISAYANVILAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S.S.MALAIKANI Advocate SR.No. 48332. TS/25.08.2015/2P - 6C KBM/SAR -I ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14468 of 2015 Date :21/08/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/