Kannan v. The State Through Inspector Of
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fourth day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.14524 of 2015 1 KANNAN 2 ANDIAPPAN 3 CHANDRA 4 MATHIYALAGAN 5 SUNDARAVADIVEL 6 SUBBAIAH ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 to 3 & 5 to 7 Vs THE STATE THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE GANESH NAGAR POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.
(IN CR. NO. 179 2015) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.P.GANAPATHI SUBRAMANIAN Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A3 and A5 to A7, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 341, 294(b), 323 and 506(i) I.P.C. in Crime No.179 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant namely Rajandran lodged a complaint against the petitioners and they had threatened him on 19.01.2015 with dire consequences due to previous enmity.
3. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the de-facto complainant is the brother-in-law of the petitioners 1 and 2 and also son-in-law of the third petitioner. The sister of the petitioners 1 and 2 lodged a complaint against the de-facto complainant and other in C.C.No.216 of 2006 for the offence under Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, on the file of the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submits that totally seven accused are involved in this case. She further submits that it is only a family dispute and no one sustained injury and no previous case against the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pudukkottai, and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 1 and 2 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required. The petitioners 3 to 6 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.
7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 04/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,PUDUKKOTTAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,PUDUKKOTTAI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GANESH NAGAR POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.P.GANAPATHI SUBRAMANIAN Advocate SR.No.43854
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.14524 of 2015 Date :04/08/2015 AA/07.08.2015/ 2p- 6c/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/