Murugan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifteenth day of February Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN CRL OP(MD) No.2321 of 2018 1 MURUGAN 2 SELVARAJ 3 RATHINAM ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Not Known Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, ALANKULAM, THIRUNELVELI DISTRICT , IN CR.NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.P.ARUN JAYATRAM Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State submitted that after completing the enquiry, the case against the petitioners was closed. Hence, the question of apprehension of arrest does not arise.

2.Recording the above statement of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 15/02/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, ALANKULAM, THIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.P.ARUN JAYATRAM Advocate SR.No.2523 GNS JAM/06/03/2018/ CSL / SAR 2 /2P-4C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2321 of 2018 Date :15/02/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/