Manivannan v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Fifth day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.14619 of 2015 1 MANIVANNAN 2 CHELLAIAH 3 KANNAN 4 DHANAM @ DHANALAKSHMI 5 RAMANI(65/15) 6 BALU @ BANUMATHI 7 SARAVANAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AWPS, VADAMADURAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.13 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498(A) and 406 IPC r/w Section 4 of Tamilnadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act in Crime No.13 of 2015 and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused demanded more dowry from the defacto complainant and harassed her. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have not committed any such offence and they have been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the defacto complainant did not appear before Mediation as directed by this Court.

4. Heard the Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the State.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Natham, Dindigul District, and on each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction to the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 1 and 2 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m until further orders and the petitioners 3 to 7 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 25/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NATHAM, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AWPS, VADAMADURAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate SR.No.49364

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.14619 of 2015 Date :25/08/2015 CSL/JGB-DP/SAR(II)/ 31/08/2015 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/