← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/2511/2018ordered

Jeyaram, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2018-02-16Honourable Mr Justice R. Pongiappan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Sixteenth day of February Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN CRL OP(MD) No.2511 of 2018 JEYARAM, ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THALLAKULAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY.

(CRIME NO.238 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.J.LAWRANCE Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Sole Accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences under Sections 294(b), 324, 506(ii) I.P.C., in Crime No.238 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 06.02.2018, due to previous enmity, the petitioner quarreled with the defacto complainant, assaulted her and sustained injuries. Hence, a case has been registered against the petitioner for the above said offences. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person, he has been falsely implicated in this case , further added that he has not involved in the alleged occurrence. He further submitted that it is a case of case in counter. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State submitted that the during the time of occurrence, the person who sustained injury has been discharged from the hospital. According to him, investigation is still pending.

5. The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side are considered. It is alleged that during the time of

occurrence, due to the previous enmity, the petitioner quarrelled with the defacto complainant , assaulted her and sustained injuries. It is a case of case in counter. According to prosecution, the person who sustained injury has been discharged from the hospital. Apart from that, except Section 506(ii) I.P.C., all other petition mentioned offences are bailable in nature. Hence, custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be necessary for completing the investigation. Therefore, for the reasons stated above, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, he is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.

II, Madurai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (i) the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of three weeks, thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

(ii) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

(iii) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

(iv) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner shall stand automatically cancelled and the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 16/02/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

msa TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, MADURAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THALLAKULAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +2. CC to M/S.J.LAWRANCE Advocate SR.No.2632,2758

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2511 of 2018 Date :16/02/2018 JAM/PM-PN/SAR-1/20.02.2018:3P/7C