Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/985/2024granted

Vanjith @ Vanjiya Devan v. The Inspector Of Police

2024-01-23Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Third day of January Two Thousand and Twenty Four PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI 1 VANJITH @ VANJIYA DEVAN 2 ANBARASAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1, 2 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANAMADURAI POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.14 OF 2024) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners :

M/S.R.SENTHIL KUMAR, Advocate For Respondent :

MR.S.MANIKANDAN, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC 438 OF CR.P.C. PRAYER : FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN CRIME NO. 14 OF 2024 ON THE FILE OF THE RESPONDENT POLICE.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 447, 427, 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act, in Crime No.14 of 2024, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and the other accused persons were assembled, assaulted the defacto complainant and scolded him using filthy language and they threatened the defacto complainant with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.

1/4

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Further he would submit that the accused No.5 was released on bail by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai, in Cr.M.P.No.184 of 2024. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that though the first petitioner is having four previous cases and the second petitioner is having two previous cases, there is no serious allegations made against these petitioners in this case and the injured is discharged from the hospital. Hence, he has no objection to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is no serious allegations made against these petitioners and the injured is discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are granted anticipatory bail and they are is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two 2/4

sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a)if the petitioners failed to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(c)the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation,; (d)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(e)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; (f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; 3/4

(g)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 23/01/2024 / TRUE COPY / /01/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

INDU TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAMADURAI.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANAMADURAI POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.R.SENTHIL KUMAR, Advocate ( SR-937[I] dated 23/01/2024 ) ORDER IN Date :23/01/2024 RS/JGB/SAR-(29.01.2024) 4P 6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 4/4